0.03/0.11	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.11/0.13	% Command    : eprover-ho %s --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --free-numbers -auto-schedule -p --cpu-limit=%d --neg-ext=all --pos-ext=all --ext-sup-max-depth=2 --schedule-kind=CASC
0.13/0.34	% Computer   : n009.cluster.edu
0.13/0.34	% Model      : x86_64 x86_64
0.13/0.34	% CPU        : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.13/0.34	% Memory     : 8042.1875MB
0.13/0.34	% OS         : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.13/0.34	% CPULimit   : 1200
0.13/0.34	% WCLimit    : 120
0.13/0.34	% DateTime   : Tue Jul 13 14:29:12 EDT 2021
0.13/0.34	% CPUTime    : 
0.13/0.34	% Number of cores: 8
0.13/0.34	% Python version: Python 3.6.8
0.13/0.34	# Version: 2.6rc1-ho
0.19/0.36	# No SInE strategy applied
0.19/0.36	# Trying AutoSched0 for 59 seconds
0.55/0.76	# AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y
0.55/0.76	# and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
0.55/0.76	#
0.55/0.76	# Preprocessing time       : 0.076 s
0.55/0.76	
0.55/0.76	# Proof found!
0.55/0.76	# SZS status Theorem
0.55/0.76	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.55/0.76	thf(conj_0, conjecture, ((s1 @ n)=(s2 @ n)|~(member_nat @ n @ (type_M1050318637scheme @ (type_M876316792e_FVar @ x)))|(type_M1690910139scheme @ s1 @ (type_M876316792e_FVar @ x))!=(type_M1690910139scheme @ s2 @ (type_M876316792e_FVar @ x))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', conj_0)).
0.55/0.76	thf(fact_15_free__tv__type__scheme_Osimps_I1_J, axiom, ![X12:nat]:(type_M1050318637scheme @ (type_M876316792e_FVar @ X12))=(insert_nat @ X12 @ bot_bot_set_nat), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', fact_15_free__tv__type__scheme_Osimps_I1_J)).
0.55/0.76	thf(fact_68_emptyE, axiom, ![X2:nat]:~(member_nat @ X2 @ bot_bot_set_nat), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', fact_68_emptyE)).
0.55/0.76	thf(fact_3_app__subst__type__scheme_Osimps_I1_J, axiom, ![X163:nat > type_Mirabelle_typ, X33:nat]:(type_M1690910139scheme @ X163 @ (type_M876316792e_FVar @ X33))=(type_M1006385707scheme @ (X163 @ X33)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', fact_3_app__subst__type__scheme_Osimps_I1_J)).
0.55/0.76	thf(fact_50_insert__iff, axiom, ![X2:nat, X504:nat, X505:set_nat]:(member_nat @ X2 @ (insert_nat @ X504 @ X505)<=>(member_nat @ X2 @ X505|(X2)=(X504))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', fact_50_insert__iff)).
0.55/0.76	thf(fact_35_mk__scheme__injective, axiom, ![X160:type_Mirabelle_typ, X619:type_Mirabelle_typ]:((type_M1006385707scheme @ X160)=(type_M1006385707scheme @ X619)=>(X160)=(X619)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', fact_35_mk__scheme__injective)).
0.55/0.76	thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ~(((s1 @ n)=(s2 @ n)|~member_nat @ n @ (type_M1050318637scheme @ (type_M876316792e_FVar @ x))|(type_M1690910139scheme @ s1 @ (type_M876316792e_FVar @ x))!=(type_M1690910139scheme @ s2 @ (type_M876316792e_FVar @ x)))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0])])).
0.55/0.76	thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, (((s1 @ n)!=(s2 @ n)&member_nat @ n @ (type_M1050318637scheme @ (type_M876316792e_FVar @ x)))&(type_M1690910139scheme @ s1 @ (type_M876316792e_FVar @ x))=(type_M1690910139scheme @ s2 @ (type_M876316792e_FVar @ x))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
0.55/0.76	thf(c_0_8, plain, ![X2543:nat]:(type_M1050318637scheme @ (type_M876316792e_FVar @ X2543))=(insert_nat @ X2543 @ bot_bot_set_nat), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_15_free__tv__type__scheme_Osimps_I1_J])).
0.55/0.76	thf(c_0_9, plain, ![X2:nat]:~member_nat @ X2 @ bot_bot_set_nat, inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_68_emptyE])).
0.55/0.76	thf(c_0_10, plain, ![X1872:nat > type_Mirabelle_typ, X1873:nat]:(type_M1690910139scheme @ X1872 @ (type_M876316792e_FVar @ X1873))=(type_M1006385707scheme @ (X1872 @ X1873)), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_3_app__subst__type__scheme_Osimps_I1_J])).
0.55/0.76	thf(c_0_11, plain, ![X2467:nat, X2468:nat, X2469:set_nat]:((~member_nat @ X2467 @ (insert_nat @ X2468 @ X2469)|(member_nat @ X2467 @ X2469|(X2467)=(X2468)))&((~member_nat @ X2467 @ X2469|member_nat @ X2467 @ (insert_nat @ X2468 @ X2469))&((X2467)!=(X2468)|member_nat @ X2467 @ (insert_nat @ X2468 @ X2469)))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_50_insert__iff])])])).
0.55/0.76	thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, member_nat @ n @ (type_M1050318637scheme @ (type_M876316792e_FVar @ x)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
0.55/0.76	thf(c_0_13, plain, ![X2:nat]:(type_M1050318637scheme @ (type_M876316792e_FVar @ X2))=(insert_nat @ X2 @ bot_bot_set_nat), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
0.55/0.76	thf(c_0_14, plain, ![X2099:nat]:~member_nat @ X2099 @ bot_bot_set_nat, inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])).
0.55/0.76	thf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, (type_M1690910139scheme @ s1 @ (type_M876316792e_FVar @ x))=(type_M1690910139scheme @ s2 @ (type_M876316792e_FVar @ x)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
0.55/0.76	thf(c_0_16, plain, ![X35:nat > type_Mirabelle_typ, X2:nat]:(type_M1690910139scheme @ X35 @ (type_M876316792e_FVar @ X2))=(type_M1006385707scheme @ (X35 @ X2)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])).
0.55/0.76	thf(c_0_17, plain, ![X3:nat, X2:nat, X6:set_nat]:(member_nat @ X2 @ X6|(X2)=(X3)|~member_nat @ X2 @ (insert_nat @ X3 @ X6)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])).
0.55/0.76	thf(c_0_18, negated_conjecture, member_nat @ n @ (insert_nat @ x @ bot_bot_set_nat), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12, c_0_13])).
0.55/0.76	thf(c_0_19, plain, ![X2:nat]:~member_nat @ X2 @ bot_bot_set_nat, inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14])).
0.55/0.76	thf(c_0_20, plain, ![X2671:type_Mirabelle_typ, X2672:type_Mirabelle_typ]:((type_M1006385707scheme @ X2671)!=(type_M1006385707scheme @ X2672)|(X2671)=(X2672)), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_35_mk__scheme__injective])])).
0.55/0.76	thf(c_0_21, negated_conjecture, (type_M1006385707scheme @ (s1 @ x))=(type_M1006385707scheme @ (s2 @ x)), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15, c_0_16]), c_0_16])).
0.55/0.76	thf(c_0_22, negated_conjecture, (x)=(n), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17, c_0_18]), c_0_19])).
0.55/0.76	thf(c_0_23, plain, ![X38:type_Mirabelle_typ, X39:type_Mirabelle_typ]:((X38)=(X39)|(type_M1006385707scheme @ X38)!=(type_M1006385707scheme @ X39)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20])).
0.55/0.76	thf(c_0_24, negated_conjecture, (type_M1006385707scheme @ (s1 @ n))=(type_M1006385707scheme @ (s2 @ n)), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21, c_0_22]), c_0_22])).
0.55/0.76	thf(c_0_25, negated_conjecture, ![X38:type_Mirabelle_typ]:((s1 @ n)=(X38)|(type_M1006385707scheme @ (s2 @ n))!=(type_M1006385707scheme @ X38)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23, c_0_24])).
0.55/0.76	thf(c_0_26, negated_conjecture, (s1 @ n)!=(s2 @ n), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
0.55/0.76	thf(c_0_27, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]), c_0_26]), ['proof']).
0.55/0.76	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.55/0.76	# Proof object total steps             : 28
0.55/0.76	# Proof object clause steps            : 14
0.55/0.76	# Proof object formula steps           : 14
0.55/0.76	# Proof object conjectures             : 12
0.55/0.76	# Proof object clause conjectures      : 9
0.55/0.76	# Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
0.55/0.76	# Proof object initial clauses used    : 8
0.55/0.76	# Proof object initial formulas used   : 6
0.55/0.76	# Proof object generating inferences   : 3
0.55/0.76	# Proof object simplifying inferences  : 7
0.55/0.76	# Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
0.55/0.76	# Parsed axioms                        : 463
0.55/0.76	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
0.55/0.76	# Initial clauses                      : 898
0.55/0.76	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 128
0.55/0.76	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 770
0.55/0.76	# Processed clauses                    : 1312
0.55/0.76	# ...of these trivial                  : 12
0.55/0.76	# ...subsumed                          : 392
0.55/0.76	# ...remaining for further processing  : 908
0.55/0.76	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 376
0.55/0.76	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.55/0.76	# Backward-subsumed                    : 11
0.55/0.76	# Backward-rewritten                   : 9
0.55/0.76	# Generated clauses                    : 10999
0.55/0.76	# ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 9097
0.55/0.76	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 9
0.55/0.76	# Paramodulations                      : 5576
0.55/0.76	# Factorizations                       : 6
0.55/0.76	# NegExts                              : 77
0.55/0.76	# Equation resolutions                 : 426
0.55/0.76	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.55/0.76	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.55/0.76	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.55/0.76	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.55/0.76	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.55/0.76	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.55/0.76	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.55/0.76	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.55/0.76	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.55/0.76	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.55/0.76	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.55/0.76	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.55/0.76	# Current number of processed clauses  : 827
0.55/0.76	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 125
0.55/0.76	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 3
0.55/0.76	#    Negative unit clauses             : 59
0.55/0.76	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 640
0.55/0.76	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 8533
0.55/0.76	# ...number of literals in the above   : 43851
0.55/0.76	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.55/0.76	# Current number of archived clauses   : 42
0.55/0.76	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 84366
0.55/0.76	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 48674
0.55/0.76	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 227
0.55/0.76	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 12256
0.55/0.76	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.55/0.76	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 74
0.55/0.76	# BW rewrite match successes           : 33
0.55/0.76	# Condensation attempts                : 0
0.55/0.76	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.55/0.76	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 180570
0.55/0.76	
0.55/0.76	# -------------------------------------------------
0.55/0.76	# User time                : 0.400 s
0.55/0.76	# System time              : 0.019 s
0.55/0.76	# Total time               : 0.419 s
0.55/0.76	# Maximum resident set size: 2604 pages
0.55/0.76	EOF